Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gunderson v. Harrington, 632 N.W.2d 695.

21 citing documents.

Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
Capital One Bank (USA), NA, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(quotations omitted), aff’d
Vilnis Neilands, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“On review of summary judgment, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party agai nst whom summary judgment was rendered.”
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis 923 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 2019
Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
Lawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services v. Northwoods Pallets, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services v. Northwoods Pallets, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see Whitney v. Leighton, 225 Minn. 1, 8, (“We recognize the rule that [when] a corporation is used as an instrument of fraud the corporate entity will be disregarded and the responsible persons held financially responsible.” (emphasis added)).
Guava LLC, Judgment Debtors, Paul Hansmeier v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Judgment Creditors, John Doe 173.19.225.244 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Guava LLC, Judgment Debtors, Paul Hansmeier v. Spencer Merkel, Qwest Communications Corporation, Judgment Creditors, John Doe 173.19.225.244 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“In certain circumstances, it is possible to ‘pierce the corporate veil’ and hold a shareholder personally liable.” (Gilbert, J., dissenting) ().
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James P. Thommes v. Honeywell International, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 718 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2006
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc. 718 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 2006
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stringer v. Minnesota Vikings Football Club, LLC 705 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 2005
Stengel v. East Side Beverage 690 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Stengel v. East Side Beverage 690 N.W.2d 380 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
Meintsma v. Loram Maintenance of Way, Inc. 684 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2004
2 When reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view “the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was rendered.”
Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Insurance Ass'n 661 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Leamington Co. v. Nonprofits' Insurance Ass'n 661 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2003