Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc., 655 N.W.2d 320.

28 citing documents.

Cambria Company, LLC v. M&M Creative Laminants, Inc. dba M&M Creative Laminates, Inc. (A22-0723) (A22-0724), Leland P. Schermer … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Michael Bartell v. Tara Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Donnelly Agency, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Antwone Ford, Minn. 2019
Olimpia Onofre Cedillo, et al v. Herbert Azubuike Igbanugo, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Bus., Inc., – 8 This requirement—that the respondents had to show that they were bringing the lawsuit to protect the generalized interests of Minnesota consumers —was only presented to and addressed by the district court in relation to respondents’ post-trial motion for attorne
Peter J. Andersen, Sr., as Trustee for the Peter J. Andersen, Sr. Family Trust v. Pamela J. Karahalios, … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Parkos Construction Company, Inc. v. Stargate, Inc., d/b/a B & H Petroleum Equipment Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
o f Bus., Inc. , -22 (Minn. App. 2001) (determining that law suit benefited the public when a school “promoted its sports-medicine-technician program through television advertisements and sales presentations ” and “[b]ut for [plaintiffs ’] lawsuit, an indefinite class of potential consumers might have been injured in the same manner as were [the plaintiffs]” ), aff’d, with Kivel v. Wealth Spring Mortg.
David Herzog, et al v. Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Herzog, et al v. Cottingham & Butler Insurance Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp. 833 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
of Bus., Inc., -30 (Minn.2003).
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 891 Minn. 2012
of Bus., Inc., (concluding that plaintiffs’ successful prosecution of their subdivision 3a claims benefited the public and holding that plaintiffs were therefore entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under subdivision 3a).
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
3a, “benefitted the public as required by Ly v. Nystrom.”
Jacobs v. Cable Constructors, Inc. 704 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Jacobs v. Cable Constructors, Inc. 704 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Of Business, Inc., aff 'd
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 680 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2004
tates that a party may make an offer of judgment for “a specified sum of money, with costs and disbursements then accrued,” but it does not define “costs and disbursements.” In Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc., we allowed recovery of statutory attorney fees when the Rule 68 offer stated a lump sum of $200,000, “together with any costs and disbursements allowed by the District Court.”
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 673 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 673 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd. 661 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2003