Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709, 359 N.W.2d 579.

45 citing documents.

Joe Schafer, et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of Minor W.S., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
No. 709 , (quotation omitted).
Ty Bernard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
No. 709, (citing DeWitt, d at 795); Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc.
Shona Tahiro, parent and natural guardian of Ramaden Waliye, a minor, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
No. 709 , d 579, 587-88 (Minn. 1984) (holding that a school district had a duty in relation to a summer car accident caused by student cheerleaders because the school district “had assumed 8 control and supervision over the cheerleading squad” even during the summer).
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
No. 709 , 588–89 (Minn. 1984) (off-campus cheerleading activity); Tiemann v. Indep.
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709 , is highly instructive.
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fenrich v. Blake School 901 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 709, a high-school cheerleader drove herself and other cheerleaders in her family’s vehicle as part of the cheerleaders’ efforts to decorate the homes of student-athletes.
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
No. 709, (“The test for setting aside a verdict as excessive is whether it shocks the conscience.”).
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
No. 709, (citation omitted).
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools 633 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cox v. Crown CoCo, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hernandez Ex Rel. Hernandez v. Renville Public School District No. 654 542 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hernandez Ex Rel. Hernandez v. Renville Public School District No. 654 542 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
There is no requirement of constant supervision of all the movements of pupils at all times.” (quoting Sheehan, 291 Minn. at 3 , d at 870 ).
Johnson v. Washington County 518 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1994
Johnson v. Washington County 518 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1994
Johnson v. Washington County 506 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Yamry-Smoley v. Zehrer 432 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Yamry-Smoley v. Zehrer 432 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The supreme court has held that a “trial court is accorded wide discretion in making evidentiary rulings.” Verhel by Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
No. 709, or that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting the verdict to stand.
Bogut v. Jannetta 410 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bogut v. Jannetta 410 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709, -93 (Minn.1984); Bakke v. Rainbow Club, Inc., 306 Minn. 99, 104-05
Jonsson v. Ames Construction, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jonsson v. Ames Construction, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“The test for setting aside a verdict as excessive is whether it shocks the conscience.” Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Nelson v. House 402 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. House 402 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The Minnesota Supreme Court held the verdict reconciliable, concluding: “Whatever duty of care Williams had with regard to supervision of the cheerleaders existed because of her employee status.” Verhel v. Independent School District # 709
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 399 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
State v. Ford 397 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1986
§ 609.06(6) to use reasonable force to restrain or correct children placed in their care; to the responsibility of teachers for reasonable supervision of students, even outside school hours in some circumstances, Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. House 388 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
BOGENHOLM BY BOGENHOLM v. House 388 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
On December 21, 1984, the supreme court in a 5-4 decision affirmed the trial court on all grounds in Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Clark v. Miller 378 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Clark v. Miller 378 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709
Dailey v. Wiborg 366 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dailey v. Wiborg 366 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See also, Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709, (the test for setting aside a verdict as excessive is whether it shocks the conscience).