Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State, 347 N.W.2d 491.

53 citing documents.

Freedom Kerkula, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Grace Elizabeth Bettie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The legislature afforded this shield from liability to promote “the preservation of Minnesota’s outdoor recreational resources in light of the growing demand for outdoor recreational facilities.” Green-Glo Turf Farms, 2 The district court did not reach the issue of statutory discretionary-function immunity.
Wade S. Nukala, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Green-Glo Turf Farms, see Ariola v. City of Stillwater , (discussing trespasser exception to recreational- use immunity), review denied (Minn. Apr.
Jacquelyn Bliss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
Krieger v. City of St. Paul 762 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Krieger v. City of St. Paul 762 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Prokop v. Independent School Dist. No. 625 754 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable … 700 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Paul, , 424 & n. 5 (Minn.1985) (noting that all constitutional challenges of the municipal tort liability statute have required application of the rational-basis test); Green-Glo Turf Farms, (holding that state outdoor recreational immunity statute did not violate Equal Protection Clause of United States Constitution under rational-basis test); Lloyd v. City of St.
Lishinski v. City of Duluth 634 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lishinski v. City of Duluth 634 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Lundstrom v. City of Apple Valley 587 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lundstrom v. City of Apple Valley 587 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The trespasser standard adopted in Green-Glo Turf Farms, and applied in later cases, follows section 335 of the Restatement (Second) *520 of Torts.
Lloyd v. City of St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lloyd v. City of St. Paul 538 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Martinez v. Minnesota Zoological Gardens 526 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Martinez v. Minnesota Zoological Gardens 526 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 510 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 510 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Zacharias v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 506 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Zacharias v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 506 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
3(h); Greerir-Glo Turf Farms, (state is immune from liability unless it fails to conform to the standard of conduct imposed under Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 333-339).
Sirek v. State, Department of Natural Resources 496 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1993
Sirek v. State, Department of Natural Resources 496 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1993
In Green-Glo Turf Farms, this court held that the DNR and similar state agencies are immune from liability unless they fail to conform to the standard of conduct imposed under the law of trespass as defined in Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 333-339.
Sirek Ex Rel. Beaumaster v. State, Department of Natural Resources 484 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Sirek Ex Rel. Beaumaster v. State, Department of Natural Resources 484 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Green-Glo Turf Farms, Cobb v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources
Johnson v. State 478 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Johnson v. State 478 N.W.2d 769 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Green-Glo Turf Farms, (Minn.Stat.
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co. 473 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Casey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 464 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re Estate of Braa 452 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1990
In Re Estate of Braa 452 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1990
Cobb v. State, Department of Natural Resources 441 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cobb v. State, Department of Natural Resources 441 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Green-Glo Turf Farms, pet.
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lienhard v. State 431 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1988
Lawler v. Soo Line Railroad 424 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Lawler v. Soo Line Railroad 424 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The occurrence in this case fits squarely within the portion of the statute providing immunity from “[a]ny loss arising from * * * creation of trails * * 1 The legal battle concerns the exception to immunity where such an occurrence “would entitle a trespasser to damages against a private person.” This exception was considered in Green-Glo Turf Farms
Jonsson v. Ames Construction, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jonsson v. Ames Construction, Inc. 409 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Henry v. State 406 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Henry v. State 406 N.W.2d 608 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 333-339 (1965)).
Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1987