Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marose v. Hennameyer, 347 N.W.2d 509.

27 citing documents.

Jeffrey Rangel Perez, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See, (affirming summary judgment against plaintiff based on a claim for future medical expenses because defendant submitted contrary evidence, and plaintiff relied on her own affidavit even though she was “not qualified to give her opinion on need for medical care”); see generally Minn. R. Civ.
Kyute v. Auslund 668 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kyute v. Auslund 668 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
uded award “only for economic damages” (emphasis in original)); (stating that compensation for future medical expenses and loss of future earning capacity, through settlement of a personal injury suit, are economic damages, as opposed to non-economic damages for pain and suffering), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990); (recognizing the appellant’s claim for future medical expenses as a claim for future economic loss).
Pemberton v. Theis 668 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
cluded award “only for economic damages”) (emphasis in original); (stating that compensation for future medical expenses and loss of future earning capacity, through settlement of personal injury suit, are economic damages, as opposed to noneconomic damages for pain and suffering), review denied (Minn. June 6, 1990); (noting that the plaintiff “claimed future economic loss in the form of future medical expenses”).
Luna v. Zeeb 633 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Luna v. Zeeb 633 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. 508 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Glarner v. Time Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Glarner v. Time Insurance Co. 465 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
A party opposing a motion for summary judgment *595 “must present specific facts showing genuine issues for trial.”
Kissner v. Norton 412 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kissner v. Norton 412 N.W.2d 354 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the defendant had similarly moved for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff failed to meet the tort thresholds necessary to maintain a negligence suit under the No-Fault Act as set out in Minn.Stat.
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
City of Faribault v. One 1976 Buick LeSabre, Serial No. 4P39J6X159337 408 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Benson v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Benson v. Johnson 392 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(lay person not qualified to give opinion on the need for future medical care).
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kessel v. Kessel 370 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carl v. Pennington 364 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carl v. Pennington 364 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Coughlin v. LaBounty 354 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lindner v. Lund 352 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Lindner v. Lund 352 N.W.2d 68 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
we upheld the entry of summary judgment because of failure to meet the disability threshold.