Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Manufactured Housing Institute v. Pettersen, 347 N.W.2d 238.
- Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 386 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
-
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone
386 N.W.2d 723
Minn. 1986
814, 823 , 28 L.Ed.2d 136 (1971) (citing L. Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action 182 (1965)); (does the agency action have a rational basis?).
- Minnesota Ass'n of Homes for the Aging v. Department of Human Services 385 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Minnesota Ass'n of Homes for the Aging v. Department of Human Services 385 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Hiawatha Aviation of Rochester, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health 375 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Hiawatha Aviation of Rochester, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health
375 N.W.2d 496
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
⅝ ⅝ * Further, the agency must explain on what evidence it is relying and how that evidence connects rationally with the agency’s choice of action to be taken.” (cites omitted).
- Matter of Schultz, Etc. 375 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Matter of Schultz, Etc.
375 N.W.2d 509
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In establishing * * * such standards, every member of the profession should be regarded as an expert."); (deference is to be shown to agency expertise, restricting judicial functions to a narrow area of responsibility, lest the court substitute its judgment for that of the agency).
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Cooke 372 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Cooke 372 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Insurance Federation of Minnesota v. Hatch 370 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Insurance Federation of Minnesota v. Hatch 370 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1985