Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., 354 N.W.2d 816.

44 citing documents.

Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Architects, Inc. , , 821 (Minn. 1984), overruled on other grounds by Hapka v. Paquin Farms , , 686-87 (Minn. 1990).
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. 796 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp. 796 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
Gray v. Badger Mining Corp. 676 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 2004
In Minneapolis Soc’y -22 (Minn. 1984), we held that the manufacturer of bricks had no duty to instruct on the appropriate precautions to follow when installing them because “the evidence was overwhelming that the architects employed by [the plaintiff
Bright Wood Corp. v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co. 665 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Bright Wood Corp. v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co. 665 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Drager Ex Rel. Gutzman v. Aluminum Industries Corp. 495 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Drager Ex Rel. Gutzman v. Aluminum Industries Corp. 495 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Architects, Inc., (explaining “there is no duty to warn if the user knows or should know the potential danger”)
Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1992
Lloyd F. Smith Co. v. Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1992
(holding that a brick building was the defective product not just the defective bricks, so that the building was not “other property”).
ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co. 481 N.W.2d 103 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Architects, -21 (Minn.1984), overruled on other grounds, Hapka, d at 688 ; see also TCF Bank & Sav., F.A.
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Architects, Inc., -21 (Minn.1984).
TCF Bank & Sav. v. Marshall Truss Sys. 466 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
TCF Bank & Sav. v. Marshall Truss Sys. 466 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Architects, -21 (Minn.1984), overruled on other grounds, Hapka, d at 688 .
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 458 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1990
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 458 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1990
Hart v. FMC Corp. 446 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hart v. FMC Corp. 446 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., -22 (1984); Westerberg v. School District No. 792, 276 Minn. 1, 10
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 431 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hapka v. Paquin Farms 431 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., the court said: In passing, we note that other courts have focused not on whether damage has occurred to “other property,” but instead on the nature of the defect and the manner in which the damage occurred.
Thofson v. Redex Industries, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thofson v. Redex Industries, Inc. 433 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., , 820 n. 4 (Minn.1984) (the policy implications of Superwood would be thwarted if the building owner were allowed “to sue in tort to recover over $6 million in damages because of relatively minor damages to the mortar,” the replacement cost of which was only a fraction of the alleged damages); S.J.
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Todalen v. United States Chemical Co. 424 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See also Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc.
Holstad v. Southwestern Porcelain, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Holstad v. Southwestern Porcelain, Inc. 421 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., , 820 n. 4 (Minn.1984).
Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros. 398 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1987
Distinguished Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros. 398 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1987
Valley first contends that Superwood and its progeny, and S.J.
Nelson v. International Harvester Corp. 394 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Nelson v. International Harvester Corp. 394 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
een adopted in some jurisdictions, stems from the policy consideration “whether the safety-insurance policy of tort law or the expectation-bargain protection policy of warranty law is most applicable to a particular claim.” Pennsylvania Sand Glass Corp. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 652 F.2d 1165, 1173 (3rd Cir. 1981)
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Balder v. Haley 390 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates, Inc., (verdict on negligent failure to warn unjustified where “overwhelming” evidence that purchaser’s architects should have known a product could be unsuitable for exterior use and that the architects were in fact advised to consult with the manufacturer before making exterior installation of the product)
Waldor Pump & Equipment Co. v. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Waldor Pump & Equipment Co. v. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., -21 (Minn.1984).
S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp. 374 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1985
S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Aerospatiale Helicopter Corp. 374 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1985
We have previously recognized that to allow a party to sue in tort to recover substantial damages because of relatively minor damages to "other property" “would thwart the policy implications of Superwood," Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., , 820 n. 4 (Minn.1984), and although the record does not indicate the relative value of the “other property," Groves admits it is a “small amount” and as such is presumably insufficient to bootstrap Groves' claims f
Tri-State Insurance Co. v. Lindsay Bros. Co. 364 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Tri-State Insurance Co. v. Lindsay Bros. Co. 364 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., at 820-821 (1984).
D & a DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Butler 357 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
D & a DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Butler 357 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc., , 821 *159 (Minn.1984) (damages sought from brick supplier for removal and replacement when original brick deteriorated are recoverable in contract, if at all); , 161 & n. 6 (Minn.1981); Note, Economic Losses in Products Liability Jurisprudence, 66 Colum.L.Rev.