Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeBaere, 356 N.W.2d 301.

67 citing documents.

  • State v. Okegbenro 409 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (Strong corroborating evidence of nonconsensual intercourse included evidence of a prompt complaint and evidence of victim’s distraught condition when she talked to police.)
  • State v. Hood 405 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Hood 405 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Miller 396 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Miller 396 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Lewis 385 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    In determining whether Spreigl evidence is relevant and material, “the trial court should consider the issues in the case, the reasons and need for the evidence, and whether there is a sufficiently close relationship between the charged offense and the Spreigl offense in time, place, or mo-dus operandi.”
  • State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the Supreme Court held that the trial court did not err in admitting Spreigl evidence concerning sexual assaults by the defendant upon five other women.
  • Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Mattson 376 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Mattson 376 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Andersen 370 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Andersen 370 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1985