Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berg v. Carlstrom, 347 N.W.2d 809.
-
James R. Pavelka, Jr., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“An agreement may be taken out of the statute of frauds .
- Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox 879 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 2016
-
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox
879 N.W.2d 653
Minn. 2016
495, 497 (1895); Roberts v. Friedell, 218 Minn. 88, 97
- Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Victor Legatt v. Dennis Legatt
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The statute of frauds applies to grants of easements.”
- Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.
826 N.W.2d 816
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
We conclude that the unclean-hands doctrine did not preclude the district court from piercing IDCA’s corporate veil because “unclean hands in a collateral matter is not a defense to equitable relief.”
- Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc.
780 N.W.2d 396
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC, -26 (Minn. 2004)
- Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Greuling v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
690 N.W.2d 757
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
but Berg predates the 1985 enactment of section 513.33.
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC 685 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 2004
- Schumacher v. Schumacher 627 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Schumacher v. Schumacher 627 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Ode 615 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Ode 615 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Manderfeld v. Krovitz
539 N.W.2d 802
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Theisen’s, Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., 309 Minn. 60 , Gartner v. Gartner, 246 Minn. 319, 321
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co. 481 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co. 481 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Olson v. Ronhovde 446 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Olson v. Ronhovde
446 N.W.2d 690
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
We believe that Ronhovde’s conduct was misleading and “arguably akin to fraud.” rearg.
- Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Bosold v. Ban Con, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Nelson v. Smith 349 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Nelson v. Smith
349 N.W.2d 849
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Berg v. Carlstrom, at 7, at 812 (Minn. April 27, *853 1984).