Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pikop v. Burlington Northern Railroad, 390 N.W.2d 743.

28 citing documents.

Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. 2016
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. 2016
If the defendant rejected such an offer, then the defendant “must pay, in addition to the costs and disbursements to which 4 Boyd cites, and the court of appeals relied on, to support the use of the Felder preemption analysis in a FELA case.
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terry Boyd v. BNSF Railway Company 858 N.W.2d 797 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
As our supreme court has warned, “[preemption of state law by federal statute or regulation is not favored in the absence of pervasive reasons — either that the nature of the regulated subject matter permits no other conclusion, or that the Congress has unmistakably so ordained.” (quotations omitted); see also Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc., (“We have ...
County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
County of Stearns v. Barnell 693 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Estate of Gullberg 652 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Estate of Gullberg 652 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester 642 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2002
Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester 642 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2002
American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant 621 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
American Tower, L.P. v. City of Grant 621 N.W.2d 37 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Company 617 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Company 617 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Pikop v. Burlington *447 Northern, R.R.
Ferrell v. Cross 557 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
Ferrell v. Cross 557 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
Co., that the focus of the state inquiry is necessarily on whether the elements of the tort alleged have been proven.
In Re the Guardianship of Nelson 547 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Guardianship of Nelson 547 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ferrell v. Cross 543 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ferrell v. Cross 543 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-53 (Minn.1986) (holding that employee’s state law IIED claim was not preempted by RLA because IIED does not stem from differing interpretations of CBA, but from tort law), cert.
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 437 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1989
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 437 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1989
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Forster v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. 423 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
320 , 66 L.Ed.2d 149 (assessment of punitive damages notwithstanding a preemption provision in the Flammable Fabrics Act); cert.
Swanigan v. Western Airlines, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Swanigan v. Western Airlines, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In addition, appellant’s claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is preempted because the claim allegedly results from wrongful discharge, not “a *612 continual pattern of harassment.”