Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hagen v. Venem, 366 N.W.2d 280.

22 citing documents.

Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Bobby Lykins, by George Duranske, conservator, Respondent, vs. Anderson Contracting, Inc., and SFM Mutual Insurance Co.,... Minn. 2025
Minn. 2021
The WCCA “is a tribunal of limited jurisdiction, restricted by statute to the construction and application of the Workers’ Compensation Act.”3 see also Minn. 3 A compensation judge decides questions of fact and law to make “an award or disallowance of compensation” based on the pleadings.
Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
Botler v. Wagner Greenhouses 754 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 2008
Botler v. Wagner Greenhouses 754 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 2008
(the WCCA is limited to “the construction and application of the Workers’ Compensation Act”).
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
5 (1998); (noting that WCCA is a court of limited jurisdiction having jurisdiction only over matters arising out of Minnesota’s workers’ compensation statutes).
O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros. 549 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1996
O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros. 549 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1996
§ 176.001 (1984) that the Act is to be construed in a nondiscriminatory manner.” , 271-72 n. 2 (Minn.1992).
Carter v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 893 P.2d 1291 Ariz. 1995
Karnes v. Quality Pork Processors 514 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Karnes v. Quality Pork Processors 514 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marron v. Industrial Commission 862 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Foley v. Honeywell, Inc. 488 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1992
Foley v. Honeywell, Inc. 488 N.W.2d 268 Minn. 1992
the amendment simply requires that the Act be construed in a non-discriminatory manner.
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Rath v. Perlman Rocque Co. 384 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1986
Rath v. Perlman Rocque Co. 384 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1986
See, Minn. Stat. § 175A.01, subd.
Freeman v. Armour Food Co. 380 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1986
Freeman v. Armour Food Co. 380 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 1986
(the WCCA is limited to “the construction and application of the Workers’ Compensation Act”).