Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Rock, 380 N.W.2d 211.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
13, 1987); d 211, 212-13 (Minn. App. 1986) (affirming revocation when probationer failed to complete treatment), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Donald Gordon Moore, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Rock , -13 (Minn. App. 1986) (affirming revocation when probationer failed to complete sex-offender treatment), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Rock , -13 (M inn.
Markhel D. Franklin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(holding that the district co urt “did not abuse its discretion in revoking probatio n based on appellant’s failure t o enter and successfully complete sexual offender treatment”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–213 (Minn. App. 1986), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-13 (Minn. 10 App. 1986) (affirming a probation revocation when the evidence showed that a probationer was “not interested in trying to change” and was unwilling to participate in sex -offender treatment), review denied (Minn. Mar.
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Jo Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronnie Jo Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that the defendant’s conduct violated his probation requirement to enter a certain treatment program when he “did not make a good faith effort to gain admission to the program and … in fact did what he could to avoid being accepted into the program”); (holding that when a court-ordered treatment program would not accept the defendant because of his unwillingness to work with the program, his actions reflected a willful violation of probation conditions), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Morrow 492 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See, -13 (Minn.App.1986) (probation revoked and presumptive executed sentence imposed because offender did not enter and complete a treatment program), pet.
State v. Walsh 456 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Walsh 456 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Tauer v. State 451 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Tauer v. State 451 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Isaacson 409 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Isaacson 409 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Muhlenhardt 403 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1987
State v. Muhlenhardt 403 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1987
2254 , 85 L.Ed.2d 636 *640 (1985); petition for review denied (Minn.1986).