Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Petition of Northern States Power Co., 416 N.W.2d 719.

46 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Formal Complaint and Request for Relief by the Minnesota Solar Advocates. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Application by Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy for Authority to Increase … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[B]y merely showing that [the utility] has incurred, or may hypothetically incur, expenses, the utility does not necessarily meet its burden of demonstrating that it is just and reasonable that the ratepayers bear the costs of those expenses.”
In the Matter of the Application by Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Application by Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Serv., (NSP); see also Minn. Power, d at 757 (“[W]e review factual determinations made within the scope of the agency’s statutory authority under the substantial evidence standard.”).
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
City of Moorhead v. Minn. Pub.
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission 731 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427 , rev’d on other grounds
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Class a License of North Metro Harness, Inc. 711 N.W.2d 129 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Pomrenke v. Commissioner of Commerce 677 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pomrenke v. Commissioner of Commerce 677 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Expulsion of I.A.L. 674 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Expulsion of I.A.L. 674 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 662 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 662 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 606 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
( (Anderson, J., concurring specially)).
Minnesota Department of Public Service v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 574 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1998
Matter of Interstate Power Rates Change Request 574 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1998
Matter of Interstate Power Rates Change Request 574 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1998
Northern States Power Co. , , 724 (Minn. 87-192) (quoting Minnesota Power Light Co. v. Minn. Pub.
Minnesota Department of Public Service v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 574 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1998
We also consider “whether the agency has adequately explained how it derived its conclusion and whether that conclusion is reasonable on the basis of the record.” Northern States Power Co., (quoting Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minn. Pub.
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(“[i]n evaluating the validity of a rate increase application, the Commission should apply the classic burden of proof analysis employed in civil cases in determining whether the utility has established the amount of a claimed cost as a judicial fact”); see also Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation
In Re the Request of Interstate Power Co. for Authority to Change Its Rates for Gas Service in … 559 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Request of Interstate Power Co. for Authority to Change Its Rates for Gas Service in … 559 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-23 (Minn.1987) (emphasis added).
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board 550 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1996
In re Wilson, 32 Minn. 145, 150 , 19 N.W.
Petition of Northern States Power Gas Utility 519 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Petition of Northern States Power Gas Utility 519 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Application of Interstate Power Co. 500 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Application of Interstate Power Co. 500 N.W.2d 501 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(Petition of NSP); Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Pub.
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
idence” is defined for ratemaking proceedings as “whether the evidence submitted, even if true, justifies the conclusion sought by the petitioning utility when considered together with the Commission's statutory responsibility to enforce the state’s public policy that retail consumers of utility services shall be furnished such services at reasonable rates.”
In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maintenance of Inside Wiring 420 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Deregulation of the Installation & Maintenance of Inside Wiring 420 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
*655 (citations omitted).
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Petition of Interstate Power Co. 419 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(No. C7-86-1482) (hereafter NSP).
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Otter Tail Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 417 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In light of the recent decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court in we conclude the Commission correctly placed upon Otter Tail the burden of proving its capital structure reasonable and just.
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Our supreme court recently rejected this argument in (Minn. Dec.