DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mesich, 396 N.W.2d 46.

34 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    Adell, d at 776; State v. 12 Mesich, , rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • State v. Yaritz 791 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. Yaritz 791 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    -53 (Minn.App.1986) (affirming a more-than-double-upward departure based, in part, on penetration of the victim’s vagina and mouth), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • Dillon v. State 781 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    (“We review the district court’s decision to depart from the guidelines’ presumptive, sentence for an abuse of discretion.”); (“A trial court’s decision to depart from the presumptive sentence specified in the sentencing guidelines is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”); (“The trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant as it did.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Adell 755 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Adell 755 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    In past cases, we have held that “[m]ultiple penetrations alone will generally justify a double, but not greater, upward durational departure.” (upholding a more-than-double durational departure for first-degree criminal sexual assault that included “six different acts of sexual abuse, including various types of penetration”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Yang 627 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    (citing and quoting State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300, 315-16 , -54 (1969), review denied, (Minn. Jan.
  • Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • Cooper v. State 565 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    D.2.b.(2) (listing particular cruelty as aggravating factor); (noting multiple acts of penetration alone will justify double durational departure), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Butterfield 555 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    (taunts, threats, and degradation of victim constituted emotional abuse that made offense more serious than typical sexual assault), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    19, 1992); (“Multiple penetrations alone will generally justify a double * ⅜ * departure.”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Allen 482 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Allen 482 N.W.2d 228 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    C. Multiple Penetrations “Multiple penetrations alone will generally justify a double, but not greater, upward durational departure.” pet.
  • State v. Yanez 469 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Yanez 469 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    A. Multiple Penetrations “Multiple penetrations alone justify a double, but not greater, upward durational departure.” pet.
  • State v. Glaraton 425 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Glaraton 425 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 1988
    Among the decisions of the court of appeals, petition for review denied (Minn.1987) [cited favorably in State v. Mortland , 94 at n. 1 (Minn.1987) ].
  • State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Strommen 411 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Strommen 411 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gaines 408 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gaines 408 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    (defendant terrified victim, forced her to submit to various types of penetration, and subjected her to outrageously gross and vile physical abuse); pet.
  • State v. Steinhaus 405 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Steinhaus 405 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    11, 1987) (imposition of three times the presumptive sentence for sexually assaulting two children); *272 (Mmn.Ct.
  • State v. Perez 404 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Perez 404 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Mortland 399 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Mortland 399 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1987
    See, (upholding imposition of maximum sentence of 240 months for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, a sentence nearly 5.5 times the maximum presumptive sentence duration in that case) petition for review denied (Minn.1986).