Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Sandberg, 406 N.W.2d 506.

20 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dahir Abdow Noor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Dahir Abdow Noor Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted); (holding that in cases of child sexual assault, “expert testimony as to the reporting conduct of such victims and as to continued contact by the adolescent with the assailant is admissible in the proper exercise of discr
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Id.; (applying Hall and affirming admission of similar expert testimony).
Carlos Avelino Contreras, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The determination of an expert’s qualification rests in the district court’s discretion, and “a ruling admitting expert testimony will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is an abuse of discretion.” State v. Sandberg , (quotation omitted) (concluding that a 15-year veteran detective who had investigated over 500 cases of child abuse was sufficiently qualified to testify that his experience demonstrated that children will often not report sexual abuse and about the settings in which they typi
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See State v. Sandberg , (excluding testimony from witnesses regarding the credibility of a sexual -abuse victim based on her reputation and specific acts of dishonesty under Minn. R. Evid.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Tetyang Puok Juate-Yout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tetyang Puok Juate-Yout Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (“It is within [district] court’s discretion to admit expert testimony concerning the reporting practices of adolescent victims of sexual assault.”).
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Danton Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Danton Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (“It is within the trial court’s discretion to admit expert testimony concerning the behavioral characteristics typically displayed by adolescent sexual assault victims.”); (“It is within trial court’s discretion to admit expert testimony concerning the reporting practices of adolescent victims of sexual assault.”); ( holding that, when defendant argues sexual conduct was consensual, “the district court has di
State of Minnesota v. Osma Mardoqueo Escho Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Osma Mardoqueo Escho Sanchez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
is admissible in the proper exercise of discretion by the trial court.”); (allowing expert testimony from a detective who was a police officer for 15 years, worked in the juvenile division for 9 years, investigated 500 child-abuse cases, and was involved in 26 classes about child abuse).
State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
State v. Moore 458 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1990
State v. Davis 422 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Davis 422 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
citing Housing and Redevelopment Authority v. Kieffer Brothers Investment and Construction Co., 284 Minn. 516, 521
State v. Ostlund 416 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 1987

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by