Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, 437 N.W.2d 35.

231 citing documents.

Rubin v. Winona State University 842 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (stating that “[w]hen a decision turns on the meaning of words in a statute or regulation, a legal question is presented” and “reviewing courts are not bound by the decision of the agency”).
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 832 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2013
Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School District 819 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 2012
Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School District 819 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 2012
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989)
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees 820 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., -44 (Minn.1989); In re Contested Case of Mapleton Cmty.
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Otto’s (quotation omitted).
Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes 806 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2011
Troyer v. Vertlu Management Co./Kok & Lundberg Funeral Homes 806 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2011
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Services, -40 (Minn.1989).
Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School District 802 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Abrahamson v. St. Louis County School District 802 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Seros., -40 (Minn.1989) (citations omitted).
Young v. Jesson 796 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Young v. Jesson 796 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
Erdman v. LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC. 788 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 2010
Erdman v. LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC. 788 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 2010
Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Services, (“When a decision turns on the meaning of words in a statute or regulation, a legal question is presented.”).
In Re Qwest's Performance Assurance Plan 783 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Qwest's Performance Assurance Plan 783 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
In Re Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
In Re Haslund 781 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 2010
Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282 781 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282 781 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989) (citations omitted).
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
(citing Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct.
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 776 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2009
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 776 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 2009
Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989) ("In considering such questions of law, reviewing courts are not bound by the decision of the agency and need not defer to agency expertise.”).
Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc. 771 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc. 771 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., (explaining that no deference is owed to agency interpretation of unambiguous regulation).
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 764 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Smith v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 764 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost 756 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost 756 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In considering questions of statutory interpretation upon review of an agency decision, “reviewing courts are not bound by the decision of the agency and need not defer to agency expertise.” St Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
Abdi v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 749 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Abdi v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 749 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989) (“When a decision turns on the meaning of words in a statute or regulation, a legal question is presented,” and therefore “reviewing courts are not bound by the decision of the agency and need not defer to agency expertise”).
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2008
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2008
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 748 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 748 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t. of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
Independent School District No. 281 v. Minnesota Department of Education 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent Sch. Dist. v. DEPT. OF EDUC. 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Independent School District No. 281 v. Minnesota Department of Education 743 N.W.2d 315 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989)).
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sletten 742 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Claim for Benefits by Sletten 742 N.W.2d 701 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Otto’s Home v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., -40 (Minn.1989).
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated Wastewater 731 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2007
Otto’s Home v. Minnesota Department of Human Services that provides us with guidance for deciding the issue before us.