Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Veit v. Veit, 413 N.W.2d 601.

38 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Rachel Naomi Simpson v. Jonathan Edward Simpson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See, (affirming the use 15 of income-averaging for fluctuating commissions from a real-estate business and reasoning that an “average takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income”).
In re the Marriage of: Angie Lynn Magnuson Swierzewski v. David Matthew Swierzewski Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“An average takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income.”).
In the Marriage of: Jeneen Marie Molldrem v. Kevin Daniel Molldrem Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Aimee Lynn Speier v. Gary Joseph Speier, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
However, the district court, explained that it was proper to rely on Gary’s average income because his income fluctuates.
In re the Marriage of: Mishaun Ahmad v. Nancy J. Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
If a maintenance obligor’s income is inconsistent from year to year, an average income “takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income.” - 33 (Minn. App. 1991), rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1991).
In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Matter of: Zoraba Ross v. Angel Raeleen Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(rejecting the argument that the parties were unable to cooperate “on any level” because evidence supported the district court’s “finding [that] the parties’ inability to cooperate was of relatively recent origin”); -33 (Minn. App. 1985) (determini
In re the Marriage of: Allan Roland Kilgore v. Ellen Lea Brockman, f/k/a Ellen Lea Kilgore Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Allan Roland Kilgore v. Ellen Lea Brockman, f/k/a Ellen Lea Kilgore Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(determining that it was appropriate for a district court to use average income when a party’s income fluctuates because “[a]n average takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income”).
In re the Marriage of: Kelly Susan LaPara v. Timothy Michael LaPara Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Zondra A. Thompson v. Eric L. Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“An average takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income.”).
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas James Davis v. Theresa Anne Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli v. Stacy Lynn Fumagalli, n/k/a Stacy Lynn Duesterhoeft, County of McLeod, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Veit v. Veit , -06 (Minn. App. 1987) (“Here, because appellant is unemployed, it is impracticable to determine her actual income.
In re the Marriage of: Elio Fumagalli v. Stacy Lynn Fumagalli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Jacqueline Lorraine Bourgoin v. Bradley Joseph Bourgoin, County of Anoka, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that when self-employed business income fluctuates, income averaging more accurately measures obligor’s net income).
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Roger Alan Roy v. Bonnie LaMay Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(affirming use of a five-year average when obligor did not have “a steady, determinable flow of income”), review denied (Minn. May 16, 1991); (affirming use of 42-month average to determine obligor’s income, because his income as a real estate agent fluctuated).
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Juan Carlos Carreon v. Michelle Sorensen, Steele County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that the district court properly relied on average income where a party’s income fluctuated based on the nature of his business and where the averaging took into account those fluctuations and therefore more accurately measured gross income than individual pay periods).
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Diane Drays Hill v. Michael C. Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 601, 606 (Minn. App. 1987) (holding that when self-employed business income fluctuates, income averaging more accurately measures obligor’s net income).
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Jodi Ann Larson v. Brian Allen Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating 16 that averaging income is proper because it “takes into account fluctuations and more accurately measures income”).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
While “[a]n average takes into account fluctuations and [may] more accurately measure[] income,” a maintenance award must “keep with the circumstances and living standards 12 of the parties at the time of the [dissolution],” Lee, d at 642 (quotation omitted), and “allow the recipient and the obligor to have a standard of living that
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Tweeton v. Tweeton 560 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Marriage of Tweeton v. Tweeton 560 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
review denied (Minn. June 30, 1986); see also Broas, d at 673-74 (applying the Hortis/Valento formula in a joint custody situation); (stating that a calculation of support consistent with the formula described in Hor-tis is appropriate in a 50-50 split of custody).
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Broas v. Broas 472 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Broas v. Broas 472 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
This court has adopted the formula set out in Hortis in several key cases: (SO-SO joint physical custody case remanded for calculation of support consistent with Va-lento)-, Valento, d at 862-63 (amount of support under Hortis formula should correspond with amount of custody); (50-50 physical custody case reve
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick 438 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1989