Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co., 447 N.W.2d 165.

70 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., -71 (Minn. 1989) (citing section 324A and holding that a security company owed a duty of care to parking-ramp patron who was assaulted because it “undertook to perform” the ramp operator’s duty to protect its customers).
James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
James R. Martin, Patrick S. Martin v. Mid-America Festivals Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Co., -69 (Minn. 1989))).
Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
Co., see also W. Page Keeton, et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 53, at 358 (5th ed. 1984).
Meagan Abel, Appellant, vs. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, et al., Respondents, St. Mary's University Minnesota, Respondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , 8-69 (Minn. 1989) (applying special-relationship analysis to conclude that duty is owed by owners of parking ramps to their customers).
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Souhsiung Jack Chiu v. Timbershore Home Owners' Association, and third party v. New Horizon Homes, Inc., Third Party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Co., -71 (Minn.1989) (noting all three bases for imposing liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A); (Hanson, J., concurring) (noting all three bases for imposing liability under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 324A); Id.
J.E.B. v. Danks 785 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2010
J.E.B. v. Danks 785 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2010
Co., (noting that, because “conflicting inferences” could be drawn as to whether a guard should have noticed a crime taking place from the uncontested facts of the case, summary judgment was inappropriate); (“All doubts and factual inferences must be resolve
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
State v. Back 775 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 2009
Foss v. Kincade 746 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Foss v. Kincade 746 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 742 N.W.2d 660 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bjerke v. Johnson 727 N.W.2d 183 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Laska v. Anoka County 696 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Laska v. Anoka County 696 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., cf. Whittemore, d at 708-09 (concluding that the manager of a trailer park did not have a special relationship with children who were abused by another resident of the trailer park because the manager rejected the children’s entrustment and told them to notify their parents); Gilbertson, 599
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Co., -69 (Minn.1989); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A(1)-(2) (noting that common carriers owe a duty to take reasonable action to protect their passengers and innkeepers owe a similar duty to their guests).
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., -69 (Minn.1989) (under the special relationship doctrine, owner and operator of commercial parking ramp facility owed a duty to provide adequate security to its customers to deter criminal activity in the parking ramp); Ponticas v. K.M.S.
Witso v. Overby 609 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Witso v. Overby 609 N.W.2d 618 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., (policy of self-help contravenes public policy); (“[i]n our modern society, with the availability of prompt and sufficient legal remedies as described, there is no place and no need for self-help”); -01
Gilbertson v. Leininger 599 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1999
Gilbertson v. Leininger 599 N.W.2d 127 Minn. 1999
Anders v. Trester 562 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Anders v. Trester 562 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-70 (Minn.1989) (holding that parking ramp owner owed a duty to protect rape victim because the general characteristics of a parking ramp facility presented a unique opportunity for criminal activities).
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1997
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore 552 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1996
HB by and Through Clark v. Whittemore 552 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1996
Co., -69 (Minn.1989); Delgado, d at 483 .
Johnson v. State 553 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1996
Co., (parole decision a discretionary function), aff'd
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Duluth 539 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1995
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
HB BY AND THROUGH CLARKE v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
H.B. ex rel. Clarke v. Whittemore 533 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Opay v. Howard Lake Liquor Store 531 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995
Opay v. Howard Lake Liquor Store 531 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1995