Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Marriage of Richards, 472 N.W.2d 162.

46 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
4 We note that, when granting the motion for amended findings, the district court acknowledged that wife had raised this claim but did not analyze whether wife met the standard to show a “colorable claim of bad faith” under
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(concluding that, “given the mandatory language in the statute, and the need for findings on the specific factors set forth in the statute, the [district] court erred by failing to make specific findings on [the] issue” of need-based attorney fees).
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(concluding that the district court “erred by failing to make specific findings” on the issue).
In re the Marriage of: Xiaoyan Sun, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The requesting party bears the burden of establishing that the other party’s conduct unreasonably contributed to the length or expense of the proceeding, and the attorney fee award must also be supported by specific findings , Richards v. Richards
In re the Marriage of: Kristina Marie Russell, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But “[w]here an obligor voluntarily creates a change of circumstances, the trial court should consider the obligor’s motives.”
Trung Thien Do, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Mary Ann Fenlon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Giesner v. Giesner, 6 (stating that, if obligor’s voluntary early retirement results in reduction in income, and obligee claims bad faith, district court should evaluate obligor’s intent to determine whether early retiremen t was made in good faith).
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
First, Foster argues that the district court made only conclusory findings in support of its fee award and cites to
In re the Marriage of: Pamela J. Atkinson n/k/a Pamela J. Kraker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Marriage of Richards
In re the Marriage of: Cassie Marie Birr, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“When an obligor voluntarily creates a change of circumstances, the [district] court should consider the obligor’s motives.”
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(remanding attorney-fee issue because court made only “general findings”); d 758, 767 (Minn. App. 2001) (“The district court did not make findings sufficient to show what combination of need [supports] the entire award.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thomas Joseph Daley v. Anne Elizabeth Daley, n/k/a Anne E. Patrick-Daley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(remanding attorney fee issue because court made only “general findings”); d 758, 767 (Minn. App. 2001) (“The district court did not make findings sufficient to show what combination of need [supports] the entire award.
Lee v. Lee 775 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2009
Lee v. Lee 775 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“Where an obligor voluntarily creates a change of circumstances, the trial court should consider the obligor’s motives.” -65 (Minn.App.1991).
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Bormann v. Bormann 644 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Bormann v. Bormann 644 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
2 (Supp.2001); (Minn.App.
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
2 (remanding attorney fee issue because court made only “general findings”).
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
C.J. Duffey Paper Co. v. Reger 588 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Johnson v. Johnson 563 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Johnson 563 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The district court concluded that husband “is voluntarily choosing to retire and is otherwise fully capable of earning income ⅜ * ⅜ » geg ñafiarás v. Richards, (holding that if maintenance obligor retires in bad faith to reduce income, obligor’s property award may be invaded in order to meet obligee’s needs).
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Walker v. Walker 553 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
see also In re Marriage of Smith, 77 Ill.App.3d 858 , 33 Ill.Dec.
Marriage of Courey v. Courey 524 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of Courey v. Courey 524 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jas v. Rjs 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of J.A.S. v. R.J.S. 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Jas v. Rjs 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Marriage of J.A.S. v. R.J.S. 524 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Kronick v. Kronick 482 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronick v. Kronick 482 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Maeder v. Maeder 480 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1992