Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens, 463 N.W.2d 303.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Although Rebecca does not argue that section 518.18 applies, it is our responsibility “to decide cases in accordance with law.” n.7 (Minn. 1990); n.1 (Minn. 10 App. 1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
-
The Weitz Company, LLC, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
consistent with existing law whe n there is nothing ‘novel or questionable’ about the relevant law.” Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens , n.1 (Minn. App. 1990) (quoting State v. Hannuksela , n.7 (Minn. 1990)), review denied (Minn. Feb.
-
In re: Estate of Mae Anderson, Deceased.
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens , n.1 (Minn. App. 1990) (applying doctrin e in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
rty’s failure to seek that specific relief); n.7 (Minn. 1990) (“[It] is the responsibility of appellate courts to decide cases in accordance with law, and that responsibility is not to be diluted by counsel’s oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities”) (quotation omitted)); n.1 (Minn. App. 1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
n.7 (Minn. 1990) (stating that appellate courts have a responsibility “to decide cases in accordance with law, and that responsibility is not to be diluted by counsel’s oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities”) (quotation omitted); n.1 (Minn. App. 1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Gaming Enterprise v. Prescott 779 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Gaming Enterprise v. Prescott
779 N.W.2d 320
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Because we are responsible for deciding cases in accordance with the law, , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center 747 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center
747 N.W.2d 586
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
matter “as the interest of justice may require”); , 673 n. 7 (Minn.1990) (“[It] is the responsibility of appellate courts to decide cases in accordance with law and that responsibility is not to be diluted by counsel’s oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities”) (quotation omitted); , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Ruter v. State 695 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Ruter v. State
695 N.W.2d 389
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
uestion of law subject to de novo review); , 673 n. 7 (Minn.1990) (stating “it is the responsibility of appellate courts to decide cases in accordance with law, and that responsibility is not to be diluted by counsel’s oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities”) (quotation omitted); , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Roth v. Weir 690 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Roth v. Weir
690 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
673-74 n. 7 (Minn.1990) (addressing appellate court’s responsibility to decide cases in accordance with existing law); , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Bagley Livestock Exchange, Inc. 690 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Bagley Livestock Exchange, Inc.
690 N.W.2d 326
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
cmt., para. 6 (West 2002) (“A debtor’s limited rights in collateral, short of full ownership, are sufficient for a security interest to attach.”); (explaining that “ownership” under the UCC can be shared, with each party possessing its own bundle of interests”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- American State Bank of Olivia v. Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc. 646 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
American State Bank of Olivia v. Ladwig & Ladwig, Inc.
646 N.W.2d 241
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co.
620 N.W.2d 909
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Jerry Mathison Construction, Inc. v. Binsfield 615 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Jerry Mathison Construction, Inc. v. Binsfield
615 N.W.2d 378
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of Aitkin 612 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of Aitkin
612 N.W.2d 177
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
673 n. 7 (Minn.1990) ("it is the responsibility of appellate courts to decide cases in accordance with law and that responsibility is not to be 'diluted by counsel's oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities’ ”) (citation omitted); , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb.
- In Re the Welfare of J.A.J. 545 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm 529 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Granse & Associates, Inc. v. Kimm
529 N.W.2d 6
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990), pet.
- Soucek v. Banham 524 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Soucek v. Banham
524 N.W.2d 478
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
This court has an “obligation to decide cases in a manner consistent with existing law.” , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990), pet.
- Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity 511 N.W.2d 472 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity
511 N.W.2d 472
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) ( , 673 n. 7 (Minn.1990)), pet.
- Bock v. Bock 506 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Bock v. Bock
506 N.W.2d 321
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
673 n. 7 (Minn.1990); , 306 n. 1 (Minn.App.1990) (same), pet.