Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scruggs v. State, 484 N.W.2d 21.
- Opsahl v. State 677 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
- Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
- Henderson v. State 675 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 2004
- Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
- Greer v. State 673 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2004
- In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe 672 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe
672 N.W.2d 623
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-14 (Minn.1998) (examining record when findings deficient on need for prisoner restraints); -25 (Minn.1992) (discussing independent examination of record when postconviction court fails to make required findings).
- State v. Powers 654 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 2003
- State v. Powers 654 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 2003
- Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
- Boitnott v. State 631 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 2001
- Voorhees v. State 627 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 2001
-
Voorhees v. State
627 N.W.2d 642
Minn. 2001
1 (2000), Voorhees contends that the postconviction court was required to make findings of fact and conclusions of law following the hearing on his postconviction petition.
- State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
- State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
- State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Fedor 628 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- Gorman v. State 619 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Gorman v. State 619 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Hummel v. State 617 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2000
- Hummel v. State 617 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 2000
- Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Sanderson v. State 601 N.W.2d 219 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
- Jihad v. State 594 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1999
- State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
- State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
- Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
- Steinbuch v. State 589 N.W.2d 464 Minn. 1999
- State v. Brocks 587 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Brocks
587 N.W.2d 37
Minn. 1998
Even if a defendant is able to prove that his counsel’s representation was constitutionally defective, the defendant must also show there was a “reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” *43 (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct.
- State v. Bauman 586 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Bauman
586 N.W.2d 416
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
24 n. 1 (Minn.1992) (holding that an issue not addressed in the briefs is deemed waived on appeal).
- State v. Lahue 585 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Lahue
585 N.W.2d 785
Minn. 1998
(citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct.
- Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
- Flournoy v. State 583 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1998
- Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
- Dunn v. State 578 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 1998
- Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Berkow v. State 573 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Ives 568 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Ives
568 N.W.2d 710
Minn. 1997
Second, the defendant must prove a “reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct.
- Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
- Robinson v. State 567 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1997
- Tsipouras v. State 567 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Tsipouras v. State 567 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Hale v. State 566 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1997