Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moorman, 505 N.W.2d 593.

70 citing documents.

State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(stating Spreigl evidence was proven by clear and convincing evidence because the defendant’s identity was not in doubt and the victim testified about the incident); (finding Spreigl incidents were proven by clear and convincing evidence because there
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Kalia v. St. Cloud State University 539 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
(finding defendant’s pri- or experience with the criminal justice system significant factor in conclusion that confession was voluntary); (same).
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
State v. Champion 533 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1995
-600 (Minn.1993) (citing Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
515, 520 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986), stating that “all” the involuntariness cases “have contained a substantial element of coercive police conduct.”
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Welfare of M.E.P. 523 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Buhl 520 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Champion 517 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1994