DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Frisinger, 484 N.W.2d 27.

70 citing documents.

  • State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State v. Sebasky 547 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    See Wermerskirchen, d at 241-42 (affirming the admission of Spreigl evidence in a criminal sexual conduct case and finding it was highly relevant to the issue of whether the conduct occurred because the defendant denied the misconduct and the trial court found the other crime was sufficiently relevant to the charged crime); (stating that a closer relationship between the Spreigl evidence and the charged crime shows a greater probative value and a lesser likelihood that the evidence will be used
  • State v. Cogshell 538 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Robinson 536 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Robinson 536 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Lanz-Terry 535 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Lanz-Terry 535 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1995
    (explaining that unfair prejudice means the evidence has an undue tendency to suggest decision-making on an improper basis).
  • State v. Hudspeth 535 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Hudspeth 535 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1995
    We have done so in a number of recent decisions
  • State v. Bolte 530 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Bolte 530 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 1995
    While “other-crime evidence is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith * * * the evidence may be admitted, if for a legitimate purpose, rather than for the forbidden purpose of inferring propensity from character.” (footnote omitted).
  • State v. King 513 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1994
  • State v. King 513 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1994
    we said: The trial court initially should follow the clear wording of Rule 404(b) and look to the real purpose for which the evidence is offered.
  • State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Wiskow 501 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    (“the closer the relationship,” the greater the probative value and less likelihood of misuse).
  • State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Poole 499 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Wermerskirchen 497 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1993
    * * * : The trial court initially should follow the clear wording of Rule 404(b) and look to the real purpose for which the evidence is offered.
  • State v. Lee 494 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1993