Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human Services for the State, 494 N.W.2d 58.

21 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“We review de novo whether the doctrine of res judicata can apply to a given set of facts.” Erickson v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Human Servs.
Steven D. Woodke, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Appellants concede that “it might appear that [they] cannot bring their counterclaim,” i.e., their former declaratory-judgment action, but they rely on Erickson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (holding that the application of res judicata may be qualified or rejected when its application would contravene an overriding public policy) to argue that the “public policy” exception to res judicata applies.
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Erickson v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Human Servs.
Philip Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 58, 61-62 (Minn. App. 1992), or the proceeding involves a recurring matter, see Wangen v. Comm’r of Pub.
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik, Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik 850 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Marie Sanvik, Below, Becky Toevs Rooney v. Charles W. Sanvik 850 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Erickson v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Human Servs.
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 731 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 731 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See Erickson v. Comm’r of Dep’t of Human Servs., (stating that the application of res judicata is in the discretion of the district court).
Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 624 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Zahler v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 624 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cf Erickson v. Commissioner of the Dep’t. of Human Servs., (stating appellant has burden of proving existence of statutory ground for reversal of agency’s decision).
Dixon v. Depositors Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Dixon v. Depositors Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Erickson v. Commissioner of Dep’t of Human Servs.
Hazelton v. Commissioner of the Department of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hazelton v. Commissioner of the Department of Human Services 612 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Erickson v. Commissioner of Dep’t of Human Servs.
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Gaw v. Dmw 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
19, 1993); (res judicata).
G.A.W. v. D.M.W. 596 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
19, 1993); Erickson v. Commissioner of Dep’t of Human Servs., (res judicata).
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 565 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Erickson v. Commissioner of the Dep’t of Human Sens.