Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Zanter, 535 N.W.2d 624.

223 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alondre Ramone Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A search-warrant application has a substantial basis when there is a “fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Earl Holland 865 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy George Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy George Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Benjamin Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Benjamin Jacobs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“To prevail, the state must ‘clearly and unequivocally’ show both that the trial court’s order will have a ‘critical impact’ on the state’s ability to prosecute the defendant successfully and that the order constituted error.” d 624, 630 (Minn. 1995).
State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A substantial basis in this context means that, given the totality of the circumstances, a “fair probability” exists “that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” d 624, 633 (Minn. 1995) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In determining whether probable cause exists, the issuing judge examines the “totality of the circumstances,” making a “practical, commonsense decision” based on “all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay information.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be 3 found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Donald Timothy Palardis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Timothy Palardis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Whether 4 probable cause exists to issue a search warrant is determined by examining the “totality of the circumstances.”
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A substantial basis means a “fair probability,” given the totality of the circumstances, “that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Larry Jermaine McCool Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. Ct. 2317, 2332 (1983)).
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
DECISION If the state appeals a pretrial suppression order, the state “must clearly and unequivocally show both that the trial court’s order will have a critical impact on the state’s ability to prosecute the defendant successfully and that the order constituted error.” (); Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Simeon Laderick Sharp Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Leon Abb Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Leon Abb Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A substantial basis in this context means “a fair probability,” given the totality of the circumstances, “that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Simeon Laderick Sharp Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A search warrant may be issued when the totality of the circumstances shows that “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
4 Probable cause requires a “fair probability that contraband or evidence of crime will be found in a particular place.”
State v. Yarbrough 828 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Yarbrough 828 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(stating that under the plain view doctrine, the law enforcement can, without a valid search warrant, "seize an object they believe to be the fruit or instrumentality of a crime, provided: (1) the police are legitimately in the position from which they view the object; (2) they have a lawful right of
State v. Milton 821 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2012
State v. Milton 821 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2012
State v. Zais 790 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Zais 790 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Fort 768 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2009
State v. Fort 768 N.W.2d 335 Minn. 2009
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
State v. Underdahl 767 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 742 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 2007
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Probable cause to search exists when, given the totality of the circumstances, “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
In Re the Welfare of J.W.L. 732 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of J.W.L. 732 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Welfare of C.T.L. 722 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re Welfare of C.T.L. 722 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Probable cause to issue a search warrant exists when, given the totality of the circumstances, there is “a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Lemmer 716 N.W.2d 657 Minn. Ct. App. 2006