Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Manning, 532 N.W.2d 244.

47 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. P. M., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
at 433 (-49 (Minn. App. 1995), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 1995)).
Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Melvin L. Allen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
” review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[ T]o constitute an ex post facto law, a statute must: (1) punish as a crime an act which was innocent when committed; (2) increase the burden of punishment for a crime after its commission; or (3) deprive one charged with a crime of a defense that was available when it was committed.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Michael John Husten, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ex Post Facto Clause “Both the United States and Minnesota Constitutions prohibit the en actment of ex post facto laws.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Rudolph Cooper, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rudolph Cooper, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting predatory-offender statute’s enacting legislation applies retroactively), review denied (Minn. Jul.
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-47 (Minn. App. 1995) (applying the 1993 version of the registration statute, when the defendant was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in 1988, began registering in July 1992, and failed to register in January 1994), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Jepson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Michael Jepson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he statute applies to offenders released from prison after August 1, 1991, regardless of the date of the offense.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rew v. Bergstrom 812 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
A statute constitutes an ex post facto law when it: “(1) punishe[s] as a crime an act which was innocent when committed; (2) increased] the burden of punishment for a crime after its commission; or (3) deprive[s] one charged with a crime of a defense that was available when it was committed.” (citing Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 52 , 110 S.Ct.
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
The court further noted that the “duty to register based on a status that is triggered by an earlier act, can hardly be understood except as applied retroactively.” Id.; -48 (Minn.App.1995) (allowing retroactive application of predatory offender statute to those convicted of sex offenses prior to statute’s effective date), review denied (Minn. July 20,1995).
State v. Bren 704 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Bren 704 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
“In evaluating constitutional challenges, the interpretation of statutes is a question of law.” review denied (Minn. July 20,1995).
State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
revieiv denied (Minn. July 20,1995).
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. July 20,1995).
State v. Pedersen 679 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Pedersen 679 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Blooflat 671 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“In evaluating constitutional challenges, the interpretation of statutes is a question of law.” review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State v. Lilleskov 658 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Lilleskov 658 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-49 (Minn.App.1995), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995); (extending Manning holding on nonpunitive nature of registration statute to registration of juvenile offenders).
In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z. 648 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z. 648 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kaiser v. State 621 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(finding that Minnesota’s registration requirement does not violate federal and state constitutional ex post facto prohibitions), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
Murray v. Cisar 594 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Murray v. Cisar 594 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995); (Minn.App.
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
Boutin v. LaFleur 591 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1999
240 , 2 L.Ed.2d 228 (1957) (stating that registration laws are “akin to licensing statutes”); (holding that section 243.166 is regulatory), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Dumas 587 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995) (citing Collins v. Youngblood, 497 U.S. 37, 52 , 110 S.Ct.
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M. 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-49 (Minn.App.1995), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995); (extending Manning ex post facto law analysis to due process challenge), review denied (Minn. May 20,1997).
Matter of Cm 578 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-49 (Minn.App.1995), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995); (extending Manning ex post facto law analysis to due process challenge), review denied (Minn. May 20, 1997).
In Re the Welfare of C.D.N. 559 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re the Welfare of C.D.N. 559 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-49 (Minn.App.1995) (upholding sex offender registration statute against ex post facto challenge), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995).