Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 535 N.W.2d 277.
- State v. Day 619 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2000
- State v. Day 619 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2000
- State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
- State v. Parker 585 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1998
- Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998
- Sullivan v. State 585 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1998
- State v. Slette 585 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
State v. Slette
585 N.W.2d 407
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
where the supreme court held that a defendant’s nonverbal act of walking out of an interrogation room was not a clear and unequivocal request for counsel.
- State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Scott
584 N.W.2d 412
Minn. 1998
But the relevant factors to be considered are the same.” (citations omitted).
- State v. Sirvio 579 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Sirvio
579 N.W.2d 478
Minn. 1998
Sirvio’s final claim relating to the admissibility of his incriminating statements is that they were “involuntary.” -88 (Minn.1995), summarizes the relevant case-law dealing with the issue of the voluntariness of a waiver of Miranda rights and with the issue of the voluntariness of a confession.
- State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Hough 571 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- State v. Miller 573 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Miller
573 N.W.2d 661
Minn. 1998
cf. Linder, d at 735 ; and Pilcher, d at 333-34 .
- State v. Juarez 572 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1997
- State v. Juarez 572 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1997
- State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Riley
568 N.W.2d 518
Minn. 1997
“[T]his court will accept the trial court’s findings of fact surrounding the giving of the statement unless those findings are clearly erroneous.”
- State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
- State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
- State v. Mills 562 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1997
- State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
- State v. Camacho 561 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1997
- State v. Schroeder 560 N.W.2d 739 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
State v. Schroeder
560 N.W.2d 739
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
The recording requirement is intended “to avoid factual disputes underlying an accused’s claims that the police violated his constitutional rights.”
- State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Marin 541 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
- State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995