Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roby v. State, 547 N.W.2d 354.

628 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. R. M., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(explaining that an appellate court does not generally consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Zephaniah James Skarja Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(noting that an appellate court will generally “not decide issues which were not raised before the district court”).
State v. Welle 847 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Haukos 847 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Welle 847 N.W.2d 52 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that this court does not generally decide issues that were not considered by the district court).
State v. Haukos 847 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Tayari-Garrett 841 N.W.2d 644 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(“This court generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court....”).
State v. Griffin 834 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2013
State v. Griffin 834 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 2013
State v. Thomas 831 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Thomas 831 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of R.D.M. 825 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Maddox 825 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(noting that defendant’s “failure to raise the issue before the district court at trial precludes its litigation on appeal”).
In re the Welfare of R.D.M. 825 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(stating that as a general rule, appellate courts will not decide issues that were not first raised in the district court).
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(“The law is clear in Minnesota that the constitutionality of a statute cannot be challenged for the first time on appeal.”).
State v. Hunter 815 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Hunter 815 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(holding that even constitutional issues are waived if not raised before the district court).
Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
We affirmed the denial of both postconviction petitions in Roby v. State (Roby II), and Roby v. State (Roby III), respectively.
Larson v. State 801 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Campos v. State 798 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that appellate courts will generally not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court); (stating that issues not briefed on appeal are waived), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Anderson v. State 794 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Anderson v. State 794 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that appellate courts will generally not consider matters not argued and considered by district court).
State v. Crawley 789 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Crawley 789 N.W.2d 899 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(noting that appellate court will generally not consider matters not argued to or decided by the district court).
Roby v. State 787 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2010
Roby v. State 787 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2010
We affirmed both the conviction and the denial of Roby’s first two postconviction petitions in Roby I, d at 510 , Roby v. State (Roby II), and Roby v. State (Roby III), respectively.
State v. Johnson 770 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Johnson 770 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
(declining to hear on appeal issues not raised below).
State v. Lopez 764 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Lopez 764 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Reviewing courts “generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court.”
State v. Basal 763 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Basal 763 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Hodges 757 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Hodges 757 N.W.2d 693 Minn. Ct. App. 2008