Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roby v. State, 547 N.W.2d 354.

621 citing documents.

David Richard Carlson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellate courts typically do not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court, but there are exceptions.
State of Minnesota v. Michael Peter Beard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Robert Stepke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Khong Meng Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Khong Meng Kong Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William Martin Odette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William Martin Odette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate courts] generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court, including constitutional questions of criminal procedure.”
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre 875 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2016
Knawon Antony Conda v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Landon Darrick Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Landon Darrick Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Because neither issue was raised to the district court
Knawon Antony Conda v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill 871 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Ellis Hill 871 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Keith Terrell Bland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terence Leon Callender v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terence Leon Callender v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Keith Terrell Bland Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(noting that while “[appellate courts] generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court,” they may “deviate from this rule when the interests of justice require consideration of such issues and doing so would not unfairly surprise a party to the appeal”).
Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Clifton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derek Jerome Vandyke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Dwayne Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Fredrick Aguirre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Clifton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Dwayne Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derek Jerome Vandyke Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[Appellate courts] generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court, including constitutional questions of criminal procedure.”).
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Fredrick Aguirre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Bakken 871 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Bakken 871 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dean William Crider Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dean William Crider Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Allen Ihnot Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Allen Ihnot Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[Appellate courts] generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court .
Fredrick Kemond Jackson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Fredrick Kemond Jackson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellate courts “generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court, including constitutional questions of criminal procedure.”
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Andrew Bursch Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Perry Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Benjamin Perry Richardson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that appellate courts generally will not consider matters not argued to and considered by the district court).
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Logan Nicholas Clay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“This court generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court, including constitutional questions of criminal procedure.”).
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“This court generally will not decide issues which were not raised before the district court, including constitutional questions of criminal procedure.”).
State of Minnesota v. Ann Adrion Schoch Minn. Ct. App. 2015