DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Greenleaf, 591 N.W.2d 488.

116 citing documents.

  • State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Yang 774 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Jackson 773 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 2009
    Id.; (“The identical nature of the charged offenses and the nearly identical evidence against each defendant supports the trial court’s decision to join [defendants] for trial.”).
  • State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
    Id.; (“The identical nature of the charged offenses and the nearly identical evidence against each defendant supports the trial court’s decision to join [defendants] for trial.”).
  • State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
  • State v. Goelz 743 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Goelz 743 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2007
    The already heavy burden a criminal defendant bears in seeking to overturn an indictment is “made even heavier when * * * the defendant has been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt following a fair trial.”
  • State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007
  • Followed State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007
  • In Re the Civil Commitment of Beaulieu 737 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • In Re the Civil Commitment of Beaulieu 737 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    541 (1952)); (stating that “even an illegal arrest in violation of an extradition treaty does not preclude criminal prosecution”); State v. Monje, 109 Wis.2d 138 , (concluding that an illegal execution of a valid warrant did not deprive court of personal jurisdiction over defendant).
  • State v. Bailey 732 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Bailey 732 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Dobbins 725 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Dobbins 725 N.W.2d 492 Minn. 2006
    we concluded that it is not error for the district court to prohibit cross-examination of an accomplice regarding the specific number of months the accomplice’s sentence could be reduced under a plea agreement.
  • State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Walker 696 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Walker 696 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (finding no prejudice when court instructed jury at beginning and at end of trial that cases against co-defendants were to be considered separately); , 631 n. 4 (Minn.2000) (setting out new cautionary instruction to be given whenever separate offenses are jointe
  • In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    TCJ’s position is inconsistent with precedent stating that “peremptory challenges belong to a ‘side,’ not an individual.” , 501 n. 6 (Minn.1999).
  • In Re Ivey 687 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • In Re Ivey 687 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    1 (statmg in a matter challenging waiver of extradition as illegally obtained, that “even an illegal arrest in violation of an extradition treaty does not preclude criminal prosecution”).
  • State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    (quoting the preceding language from Stincer).
  • State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Blom 682 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2004
    (stating “the constitutional right to a fair criminal trial does not guarantee a perfect trial”).
  • State v. Reiners 664 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Reiners 664 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
  • State v. Taylor 650 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 2002
    However, “[a]n indictment should be dismissed if the prosecutor knowingly engaged in misconduct that substantially influenced the grand jury’s decision to indict and if - a reviewing court gravely doubts that the decision to indict was free of any influence of the miseon-duct.”
  • Santiago v. State 644 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2002
  • Santiago v. State 644 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 2002
    The court, in interpreting subdivision 3(3), took guidance from the federal rules as well as two of our cases that were decided after Santiago’s trial —
  • In re the Welfare of R.J.E. 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
  • In Re RJE 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
  • In Re RJE 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
    Here, the evidence consisted primarily of the complainant's statement taken from police reports, which we have traditionally considered to be inherently unreliable, (stating that "unsworn, ex parte statements made during police questioning have traditionally been considered inherently untrustworthy").
  • In re the Welfare of R.J.E. 642 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 2002
    Here, the evidence consisted primarily of the complainant’s statement taken from police reports, which we have traditionally considered to be inherently unreliable, (stating that “unsworn, ex parte statements made during police questioning have traditionally been considered inherently untrustworthy”).
  • State v. James 638 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. James 638 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Greer 635 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Greer 635 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 2001
    2142 , 90 L.Ed.2d 636 (1986)
  • State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Rhodes 627 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 2001
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See, (declaring erroneously admitted hearsay to be harmless beyond reasonable doubt where substantial quantum of other evidence pointed to defendant’s guilt), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 863 , 120 S.Ct.