Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d 720.

78 citing documents.

State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
State v. Harris 667 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 2003
“The legislature’s delegation of an area of the district court’s original jurisdiction calls for this court’s close scrutiny.” (holding that the legislature infringed on the original jurisdiction of the district courts when it empowered administrative law judges to decide child support matters).
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Reiling v. City of Eagan 664 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(stating district court’s equitable jurisdiction gives court “inherent power to grant equitable relief’).
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
State v. Baird 654 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 2002
Examples of our application of the special circumstances test include: 727 (Minn.1999) (applying the special circumstances test and holding that the administrative child sup *112 port process is violative-of the separation of powers doctrine and thus unconstitutional and that this ruling is nonretroactive); (applying s
In Re Ramsey Cty. Ex Rel. Pierce Cty., Wis. 645 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Ramsey Cty. Ex Rel. Pierce Cty., Wis. 645 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(holding that obligor's child support obligation is offset by social security disability benefits paid on behalf of obligor's child), aff'd on other grounds
Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
Putz v. Putz 645 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2002
we stated that the jurisdiction of the courts in cases involving child support is equitable in origin and the courts’ authority to craft remedies in such cases is an outgrowth of inherent equitable powers.
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-26 (Minn.1999) (finding statutory process violated separation of powers by infringing on court’s original, equitable jurisdiction in family law).
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
Appellant argues that the statutes at issue here are unconstitutional because, the commissioner’s authority to control supervised and conditional release revocation usurps and interferes with functions of the judiciary.
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
16 (2000) (stating " '[s]hall’ is mandatory”); (stating, in a case where it was ultimately determined that Minn.Stat.
State v. Schwartz 615 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Schwartz 615 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In support of his argument that Minnesota’s parole system constitutes executive interference with the judiciary, Schwartz cites two recent Minnesota Supreme Court cases, and Irwin v. Surdyk’s Liquor
In Re Estate of Janecek 610 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2000
In Re Estate of Janecek 610 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Anderson v. Rengachary 608 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2000
Berg v. D.D.M. 603 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Berg v. D.D.M. 603 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In light of this court’s aff' d, and our review of the decisions from other jurisdictions, we conclude a child’s receipt of social-security survivor’s benefits should be credited against any duty imposed on the obligor’s estate.
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Winona County Department of Human Services v. Casper 593 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Winona County Department of Human Services v. Casper 593 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Appellant argues the administrative law judge (ALJ) erred when he refused to credit social security disability benefits paid on behalf of his minor daughter against child support arrearages that accrued before this court’s aff'd