Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Leek v. American Express Property Casualty, 591 N.W.2d 507.
- Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cas., d 507, 509 (Minn. App. 1999), review denied (Minn. Apr.
- Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Gregory B. Lindwall v. Country Preferred Insurance Company
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cas., review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
-
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.
835 N.W.2d 472
Minn. 2013
Cas., rev. denied (Minn. July 7, 1999)).
- SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center 777 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
SINGELMAN v. St. Francis Medical Center
777 N.W.2d 540
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Cas., review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- Roehrdanz v. Brill 668 N.W.2d 217 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
Roehrdanz v. Brill
668 N.W.2d 217
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cas., review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- In Re Conservatorship of Smith 655 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In Re Conservatorship of Smith
655 N.W.2d 814
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cas., (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625 643 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625
643 N.W.2d 645
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cas., -09 (Minn.App.1999), review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- Year 2001 Budget Appeal of Landgren v. Pipestone County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Year 2001 Budget Appeal of Landgren v. Pipestone County Board of Commissioners
633 N.W.2d 875
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cas., -09 (Minn.App.1999) (noting that rules concerning the “commencement of an action should be construed * * * to provide a single, uniform course of procedure” applicable to all civil actions (citation omitted)), review denied (Minn. July 7,1999).
- Holm v. Casino Resource Corp. 632 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Holm v. Casino Resource Corp.
632 N.W.2d 238
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“Regardless, the Minnesota Supreme Court has rejected the notion that district court review of an arbitration award is a special proceeding rather than an ordinary civil action.” review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999) (citing Pulju v. Metropolitan Property & Cas., -09 (Minn.1995) (reversing this court’s determination that district court review of arbitration is “special proceeding” pursuant to Minn. R. Civ.App.
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.
618 N.W.2d 609
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-09 (Minn.App.1999), review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999).
- World Championship Fighting, Inc. v. Janos 609 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
World Championship Fighting, Inc. v. Janos
609 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. July 7, 1999), we dealt with a similar contention.
- Hughes v. Lund 603 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Hughes v. Lund
603 N.W.2d 674
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The rule requires strict compliance with procedure, and “[s]ervice by mail is ineffectual if the sender does not receive an acknowledgment.” (citation omitted), review denied (Minn. July 7,1999).
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Allen 590 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Allen 590 N.W.2d 820 Minn. Ct. App. 1999