Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Maurer v. Maurer, 623 N.W.2d 604.

127 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellate courts will not set aside a district court’s determination of an asset’s value unless the finding was “clearly erroneous on the record as a whole.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn R. Rauworth, n/k/a Kathryn R. Kendall v. Barry L. Rauworth Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This discretion is not unlimited, as the district court must have a “reasonable and supportable basis for making an informed judgment as to the probable liability.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John Bernhagen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherina Theresa Bernhagen v. Peter John Bernhagen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Helen Kernik v. James Kernik, Judith Murphy Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hertz v. Hertz, 304 Minn. 144, 145
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Passolt v. Passolt 804 N.W.2d 18 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
We also conclude that the district court misapplied the law regarding spousal maintenance based on its reading of Carrick; rev’d on other grounds
Marriage of McIntosh v. McIntosh 740 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of McIntosh v. McIntosh 740 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Hertz v. Hertz, 304 Minn. 144, 145
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Baker v. Baker 733 N.W.2d 815 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The district court acted within its discretion by applying the marginal tax rates, and it had a “reasonable and supportable basis for making an informed judgment as to [the] probable liability.” (quotation omitted).
Marriage of Rauenhorst v. Rauenhorst 724 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Marriage of Rauenhorst v. Rauenhorst 724 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
1997), for proposition that finding bad faith is prerequisite to imputing income to party seeking maintenance and, like Carrick , reversing denial of maintenance to party whose voluntary underemployment was not in bad faith), rev’d on other grounds
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Youker v. Youker 661 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The district court mistakenly relied upon Carrick, d at 410-11 (Minn.App.1997), -81 (Minn.App.2000), rev’d on other grounds, in holding that respondent’s continued employment at the same full-time position that she held during the mar *271 riage did not constitute bad-faith underemployment.
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Robert v. Zygmunt 652 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Appellant argues that the trial court improperly imputed income to him without finding that he is underemployed in bad faith; in support, rev’d on other grounds
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Moreover, requires the district court to consider the issue of tax liability on his pension interests.
Marriage of Antone v. Antone 645 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2002
Marriage of Antone v. Antone 645 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2002