Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSG, 622 N.W.2d 114.

76 citing documents.

Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 788 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Importantly, however, “[wjhen a question of statutory construction involves a failure of expression rather than an ambiguity of expression, courts are not free to substitute amendment for construction and thereby supply the omissions of the legislature.” Genin v. *164 1996 Mercury Marquis, (quotation omitted).
Johnson v. Cook County 786 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2010
Johnson v. Cook County 786 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 2010
Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
See Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, see also Wallace v. Comm’r of Taxation, 289 Minn. 220, 230
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
See Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, (stating that the court may not add words to a statute).
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 755 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 755 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
No. 112, see also Genin v.1996 Mercury Marquis, (rejecting construction of statute that would “add words to the statute [because] the rules governing statutory construction forbid that”).
Botler v. Wagner Greenhouses 754 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 2008
Botler v. Wagner Greenhouses 754 N.W.2d 665 Minn. 2008
“When a question of statutory construction involves a failure of expression rather than an ambiguity of expression, courts are not free to substitute amendment for construction and thereby supply the omissions of the legislature.” Genin v.1996 Mercury Marquis, (internal quotation marks omitted).
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
When a question of statutory construction involves a failure of expression rather than an ambiguity of expression, "courts are not free to substitute amendment for construction and thereby supply the omissions of the legislature.” Genin v.1996 Mercury Marquis, (quoting State v. Moseng, 254 Minn. 263, 269 , -12 (1959)).
Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 728 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2007
Reider v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 728 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2007
See Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX6U211, License No. MN 225 NSG
In Re the Estate of Barg 722 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Estate of Barg 722 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, -17 (Minn.2001) (stating that rules of statutory construction prohibit adding words or meaning to statute when legislature has not).
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista 713 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of Minnetrista 713 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Genin v.1996 Mercury Marquis
River Valley Truck Center, Inc. v. Interstate Companies 704 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2005
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc. 676 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2004
Genin v. 1996 Memory Marquis