Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wasson, 615 N.W.2d 316.
- State v. Anhalt 630 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
State v. Anhalt
630 N.W.2d 658
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Moreover, boilerplate language without particularized reasons for an unannounced entry is insufficient to show that an announced entry “would be dangerous or allow the destruction of evidence.” -48 (Minn.App.1998) (finding that officer’s statement that “because of his experience he knew that the occupants would likely have and use weapons” was a generalization), review denied (Minn. July 16, 1998).
- Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Garza v. State 619 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Barnes 618 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2000