Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina, 624 N.W.2d 813.
- Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
−19 (Minn. App. 2001) (noting multiple possible bases for attorney-fee awards in family cases, that each has different requirements, and assuming, when a district court failed to identify the authority under which it awarded fees, that the fees were awarded under Minn. Stat. § 518.14, subd.
- In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Dawn Marie Mondus Loger v. Cory Scott Loger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Terrence Reily Peters v. Deanna Lynn Peters
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
1, are to be based on behavior occurring during the litigation process, behavior occurring outside the litigation process is not a basis for a conduct-based fee award under that provision.”
- In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Lizhi Zhang v. Zheng Fu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
may be made regardless of the recipient’s need for fees and regardless of the payor’s ability to contribute to a fee award.”
- In re the Marriage of: Jonathan Conneely v. Hannah Stancek, f/k/a Hannah Conneely Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
In re the Marriage of: Jonathan Conneely v. Hannah Stancek, f/k/a Hannah Conneely
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Marriage of Hunley v. Hunley 757 N.W.2d 898 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Marriage of Hunley v. Hunley
757 N.W.2d 898
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
1 (2006) (listing the requirements for need-based, as well as conduct-based, attorney fees); (noting that lack of specific findings on need-based factors is not fatal if order “reasonably implies that the district court considered the relevant factors and where the district court was familiar with the history of the case and had access to the parties’ financial records”) (quotation omitte
- Brodsky v. Brodsky 733 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Brodsky v. Brodsky 733 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Sammons v. Sammons 642 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Sammons v. Sammons 642 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 642 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 642 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2002