Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Marchbanks, 632 N.W.2d 725.
- State of Minnesota v. Janiece Rochelle Asante Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Janiece Rochelle Asante Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Alex Cennedi Closmore Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Nathan John Valinski Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Nathan John Valinski
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[T]he district court is in the best position to evaluate whether prejudice, if any, warrants a mistrial.”
- State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. McCauley
820 N.W.2d 577
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
When facts are not in dispute, we review de novo “whether multiple offenses form part of a single behavioral act.”
- State v. Cogger 802 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Cogger 802 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Grampre 766 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Grampre 766 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Netland 742 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006
- State v. Kendell 723 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 2006