Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ture, 632 N.W.2d 621.
- Brenda Lynne Schoenecker v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Christopher Roehl
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The state bears the burden of establishing an exception to the warrant requirement.”
- Brenda Lynne Schoenecker v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Jeremy Robert Christen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Jeremy Robert Christen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Rohde 839 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Rohde 839 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hawkinson 829 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Hawkinson
829 N.W.2d 367
Minn. 2013
333 ; and (2) whether the State failed to follow standard procedures when it destroyed the evidence, 629 (Minn.2001) (affirming the district court’s finding that there was no bad faith by noting the police’s compliance with *374 standard procedures helped demonstrate a lack of ulterior motives).
- State v. Lemert 829 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Lemert 829 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hanks 817 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2012
- State v. Hanks 817 N.W.2d 663 Minn. 2012
- State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
- State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
- State v. Organ 234 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- State v. Gauster 752 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2008
- State v. Gauster 752 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2008
- State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
- State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
- State v. Voss 683 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Voss 683 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Ture v. State 681 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2004
-
Ture v. State
681 N.W.2d 9
Minn. 2004
(affirming conviction for four counts of first-degree murder).
- Haase v. Commissioner of Public Safety 679 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Haase v. Commissioner of Public Safety 679 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Volkman 675 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Pirsig 670 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Manley
664 N.W.2d 275
Minn. 2003
In order to prevail on such a claim, Manley “has the burden of demonstrating that (1) his counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s errors.”
- State v. Licari 659 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2003
- State v. Licari 659 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2003
- State v. Krosch 642 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2002
-
State v. Krosch
642 N.W.2d 713
Minn. 2002
746 n. 1 (Minn.1998); Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339 , (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on *720 appeal unless
- Robledo-Kinney v. State 637 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2002