Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp., 644 N.W.2d 801.

305 citing documents.

Bray v. Dogs & Cats Ltd. (1997) 679 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
ANALYSIS I. Misconduct On appeal, “we review the commissioner’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the commissioner’s decision and will not disturb them as long as there is evidence that reasonably tends to sustain those findings.”
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vargas v. Northwest Area Foundation 673 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Risk v. Eastside Beverage 664 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Whether the employee committed an act alleged to be employment *20 misconduct is a fact question, but the interpretation of whether that act is employment misconduct is an issue of law.