Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Borrego, 661 N.W.2d 663.

25 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A sentence is unauthorized if it is “contrary to law or applicable statutes .” (citation omitted).
Lorenzo Damien Brewer, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Forrest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Forrest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Interpretation of a sentencing statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo.”
Jerry Wayne Gerrard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jerry Wayne Gerrard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(procedural rules); (sentencing statutes).
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Carl Harris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Carl Harris Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Interpretation of a sentencing statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo.”
Terence Jerome Wilson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Terence Jerome Wilson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
at 214-15; - 67 (Minn. App. 2003).
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larry Roosevelt Noble v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington, d at 214–15; –67 (Minn. App. 2003).
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. David Eugene Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Randall Mark Spears v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Randall Mark Spears v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
at 214; (“An unauthorized sentence must be contrary to statutory requirements.”).
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ronald James Kettle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Washington v. State 845 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
a district court, on its own initiative, corrected two sentences by ordering the offender to serve the sentences consecutively instead *213 of concurrently, as the district court had ordered one day earlier.
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Amundson 828 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(procedural rules); (sentencing statutes).
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Miller v. State 714 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Miller v. State 714 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2006