Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lee, 683 N.W.2d 309.

107 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 726 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 2007
    See, (reviewing for harmless error without discussion of whether that standard is appropriate).
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    (applying harmless-error analysis to erroneous omission of accomplice-testimony instruction without specifying whether defendant requested instruction).
  • State v. Gail 713 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Gail 713 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 2006
    This court evaluates “the erroneous omission of [an accomplice] jury instruction under a harmless error analysis.” 9
  • State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
    -16 (Minn.2004); State v. Guy, 259 Minn. 67, 74