Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., 666 N.W.2d 339.

130 citing documents.

Suncom, LLC v. Robert Feuling d/b/a West Side Liquors of Sartell, LLC, and West Side Liquors of Sartell, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[B]ut the interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Leslie Davis v. Macy's Retail Holdings, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A contract is ambiguous if, based upon its language alone, it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., (quotation omitted).
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[W]hether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law, but the interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact for the [fact-finder].” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nuvola, LLC v. Morgan Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Contract construction is “a question of law unless the contract is ambiguous.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
David Waterworth v. Elaine Ekman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David Waterworth v. Elaine Ekman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First, we will construe and apply a contract by its plain terms “even if the result is harsh.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., –47 (Minn. 2003).
Michael N. Palm, Sr. v. Calhoun Realty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael N. Palm, Sr. v. Calhoun Realty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We review the district court’s construction of the contract de novo, because contract construction is “a question of law unless the contract is ambiguous.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., –47 (Minn. 2003) (quotation omitted).
Anchor Bank, N. A. v. Matthew L. Gulbransen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., see also Donnay, 275 Minn. at 45, d at 716 (“It is generally recognized that summary judgment is not appropriate where the terms of a contract are at issue and any of its provisions are ambiguous or unclear.”).
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy Lundgren v. Diane Cash Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A contract is ambiguous if, based upon its language alone, it is reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., (quotation omitted).
Cityscapes Development, LLC v. Larry Scheffler 866 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cityscapes Development, LLC v. Larry Scheffler 866 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But the interpretation of an ambiguous contract provision is a question of fact, Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., reviewed for clear error, see Minn. R. Civ.
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., (“[T]he interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact.
Gary A. Meiners v. Kruckow Companies, LLC, and third party v. Anthony R. Hammell, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gary A. Meiners v. Kruckow Companies, LLC, and third party v. Anthony R. Hammell, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The determination of whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law, but the 8 interpretation of an ambiguous contract is a question of fact for the jury.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., (citation omitted).
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lee D. Weiss, Weiss Capital Real Estate Group, LLC v. Private Capital, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Geneva JPM 2003-PM1, LLC v. Geneva FSCX I, LLC 843 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Geneva JPM 2003-PM1, LLC v. Geneva FSCX I, LLC 843 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
is a question of law unless the contract is ambiguous.” Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP 812 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Baker v. Best Buy Stores, LP 812 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Savela v. City of Duluth 806 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2011
KILCHER v. Dale 784 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
KILCHER v. Dale 784 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co., In re Denial of Eller Media Co.'s Applications for Outdoor Adver.
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
BankCHEROKEE v. INSIGNIA DEVELOPMENT, LLC 779 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Followed In Re the Complaint of the Minnesota Department of Commerce for Commission Action Against AT & T 759 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
I. “The construction of a statute or a regulation is a question of law to be determined by the court.” Denelsbeek v. Wells Fargo & Co.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Fish v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 748 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2008

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by