Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Soukup, 656 N.W.2d 424.

59 citing documents.

State v. Zais 790 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
This extension of disorderly conduct to include a “personal offense” is also reflected in the holding that “self-defense is applicable to a charge of disorderly conduct [when] the behavior forming the basis of the offense presents the threat of bodily *862 harm.”
State v. Kilmer 741 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Kilmer 741 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co. v. James Courtney Law Office, P.A., review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Johnson 699 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Johnson 699 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied, (Minn. Apr.
Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of Lonsdale 697 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Community Partners Designs, Inc. v. City of Lonsdale 697 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
review denied (Minn. Apr.
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(describing “dictum” as statement concerning issue not addressed in adversarial briefing and argument).