Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Myers, 359 N.W.2d 604.

220 citing documents.

  • Adesiji v. State 384 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Adesiji v. State 384 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the supreme court held that expert testimony about the emotional and psychological characteristics of children who have been sexually abused is admissible, see id.
  • State v. Bellotti 383 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Fitzgerald 382 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Appellant’s is misplaced.
  • State v. Bellotti 383 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    the supreme court observed: As a general rule, however, we would reject expert opinion testimony regarding the truth or falsity of a witness’ allegations about a crime, for the expert’s status may lend an unwarranted “stamp of scientific legitimacy” to the allegations, (citation omitted) Myers ultima
  • Scott v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Scott v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Miller 377 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Miller 377 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    the victim of sexual abuse was an eight-year old child.
  • State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Folley 378 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Soukup 376 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Soukup 376 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of R.B. 369 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of R.B. 369 N.W.2d 353 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1985
    Recently, we upheld the admission in a case of child sexual abuse of qualified expert testimony describing the psychological and emotional characteristics typically observed in sexually abused children and those observed in the complainant in that case.
  • State v. Carlson 360 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Carlson 360 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    in which the court held that a trial court has the discretion to allow qualified expert testimony about the characteristics typical of sexually abused children.