Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss, 336 N.W.2d 546.
- ITASCA CTY. SOC. SERV. EX REL. HALL v. David 379 N.W.2d 700 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Marriage of Koop v. Koop 378 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Koop v. Koop 378 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Gustafson v. Gustafson 376 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Gustafson v. Gustafson 376 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Morey v. Peppin 375 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1985
- Morey v. Peppin 375 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1985
- Knutson v. Primeau 371 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Knutson v. Primeau
371 N.W.2d 582
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
and that the court erred in adopting the referee’s revised recommendation.
- Marriage of Young v. Young 370 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Young v. Young 370 N.W.2d 57 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer 364 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer 364 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Grein v. Grein 364 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1985
-
Marriage of Grein v. Grein
364 N.W.2d 383
Minn. 1985
we held that section 518.18(d) establishes a three-part test for modification of child custody orders.
- Johnson v. Lundell 361 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Johnson v. Lundell 361 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker 358 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Rinker v. Rinker 358 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of King v. Carroll 356 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Marriage of King v. Carroll
356 N.W.2d 449
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
the court stated: Thus, for a custody modification, the court must first make a two-fold finding: (1)that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child or his custodian, and (2) that the modification of custody is necessary to serve the best interests of the child.
- Benson v. Webb 356 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Benson v. Webb 356 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Sumner v. Sumner 353 N.W.2d 251 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Englund v. Englund 352 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Englund v. Englund 352 N.W.2d 800 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Marriage of Heard v. Heard 353 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Marriage of Heard v. Heard
353 N.W.2d 157
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
1978 amendments that formed the present content of § 518.18 are recognized as a statutory scheme that “is indicative of a legislative intent to impart a measure of stability to custody determinations in most circumstances.”
- Chapman v. Chapman 352 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Chapman v. Chapman 352 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- In Re the Marriage of Gottenborg 343 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- In Re the Marriage of Gottenborg 343 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1984