Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Trust Created Under Agreement With McLaughlin, 361 N.W.2d 43.

29 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Arthur F. Symens Revocable Trust created September 21, 2016. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin, -45 (Minn. 1985)); ( stating that a court’s “primary concern is to give effect to the testator’s intent as expressed in the plain language of the will”).
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Leonard E. Erlandson and Marion L. Erlandson Irrevocable Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin, -45 (Minn. 1985).
Suzanne Stephens, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin, -45 (Minn. 1985).
Jeffrey D. Kuhn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Trust of Eva Marie Hanson Living Trust dated December 11, 1995. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin, -45 (Minn. 1985) (citation omitted).
In Re: B.C. Fox Trust, U/A/D, July 1, 1997, as Amended. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“If the trust agreement is unambiguous, a court should look to the language of the agreement to discern the grantor’s intent and not consider extrinsic evidence.” Van Dusen, d at 520; see also In re Trust Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin , -45 (Minn. 1985).
In re the Trust of Lawrence B. Schwagerl Trust Under Agreement Dated April 9, 1999. Minn. 2021
17, 1969, –45 (Minn. 1985) (explaining that “the first step in the analysis of a trust instrument is to determine the intent of the settlor from the plain language of the instrument”).
In the Matter of The Leora L. Buerkle Irrevocable Insurance Trust dated September 17, 1993. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Accordingly, “[i]f the trust agreement is unambiguous, a court should look to the language of the agreement to discern the grantor’s intent and not consider extrinsic evidence.” Van Dusen, d at 520; see also In re Trust Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin , -45 (Mi nn.
In re Rutherford D. Brosious Trust Agreement. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Accordingly, “[i]f the trust agreement is unambiguous, a court should look to the language of the agreement to discern the grantor’s intent and not consider extrinsic evidence.” Van Dusen, d at 520; see also I n re Trust Created Under Agreement with McLaughlin, -45 (Minn. 1985).
In re: Sidney A. Goodman Revocable Trust, U/A/D December 16, 1985 as Amended Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If the trust agreement is unambiguous, we discern the grantor’s intent from the language of the trust agreement and do “not consider extrinsic evidence.” 11 Id.; - 45 (Minn. 1985 ).
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re: Amendment and Restatement of Revocable Living Trust of Alfred J. Berget dated February 15, 2005. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re Trusteeship Under Agreement with Mayo, 259 Minn. 91, 95
Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 799 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 799 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(suggesting that evidence of unreasonable delay on the part of the trustee or evidence of a beneficiary’s intent to defraud his creditors “by leaving assets, which he has a right to demand, in a spendthrift trust” might support a finding that proceeds have been distributed in fact).
NC Properties, LLC v. Lind 797 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
NC Properties, LLC v. Lind 797 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(applying rule in context of trust agreement).
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Bolander v. Bolander 703 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Foley Trust 671 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
“The court’s purpose in construing a trust is to ascertain the intent of the settlor.”
Morrison v. Doyle 582 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 582 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Morrison v. Doyle 570 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Govern v. Hall 430 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Govern v. Hall 430 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
A Trust created under agreement with McLaughlin, (citing Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, § 1010 (Revised edition 1983)).