Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stassen v. Stassen, 351 N.W.2d 20.

31 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Alisha Christine Steinolfson v. Christopher Steingrimur Steinolfson, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Marriage of: Alisha Christine Steinolfson v. Christopher Steingrimur Steinolfson, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
And although the district court may not divide marital property based on any finding of fault, it is not prohibited from considering a spouse’s conduct that bears on the parties’ relative contributions toward the value of marital property
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Rachel Marie Benedict v. Thomas Jerry Benedict Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Richard Leo Bassing, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“[A] finding of fault .
In re the Marriage of: Francis Stephen Gill, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
18 “Equitable, not equal, division of marital property is required.” Crosby v. Crosby , review denied (Minn. Feb.
Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek 693 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Marriage of Sirek v. Sirek 693 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(stating that a court may not base property division upon a finding of fault, which “includes a finding that one spouse was a habitual consumer of alcoholic beverages”); see also Minn.Stat.
Marriage of Berenberg v. Berenberg 474 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Berenberg v. Berenberg 474 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Bury v. Bury 416 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Equity does not require an equal division; “[e]quitable, not equal, division of marital property is required.” ().
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Batsell v. Batsell 410 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Letsch v. Letsch 409 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 401 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 401 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-24 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) we upheld a 25% interest in the marital property because both parties received homes, income-producing apartments and their monthly Social Security benefits.
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Ziemer v. Ziemer 386 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
§ 518.58 (1984); , 23 *351 (Minn.Ct.App.1984) ().
Marriage of Olness v. Olness 364 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Olness v. Olness 364 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
“Equitable, not equal, division of marital property is required.”
Kowalzek v. Kowalzek 360 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kowalzek v. Kowalzek 360 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 356 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 356 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Oberle v. Oberle 355 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by