Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow, 356 N.W.2d 426.

32 citing documents.

David Forster, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
However, a party “may not consent to a court acting when it has no subject -matter jurisdiction.” see McCullough & Sons, (noting that unlike a defect in the court’s subject-matter jurisdiction, parties can waive defects in personal jurisdiction).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bemidji Township v. City of Bemidji, Northern Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (holding that district court lacked jurisdiction to enter post-appeal order amending judgment and decree).
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 582 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1998
Marzitelli v. City of Little Canada 582 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1998
See, (in which appellate court granted one stay for district court to issue amended findings but denied second request).
Frank v. Winter 528 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Frank v. Winter 528 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
970 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1056 (1991)
Town of Belle Prairie v. Kliber 448 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Town of Belle Prairie v. Kliber 448 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Marriage of Amatuzio v. Amatuzio 431 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Ri-Mel, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
128.02; (new matters may not be raised in a reply brief).
Marriage of Koenen v. Koenen 413 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Koenen v. Koenen 413 N.W.2d 280 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Edsten v. Edsten 407 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Edsten v. Edsten 407 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Redning seeks to fortify his claim that the trial court’s appeal after remand, and subsequent cases holding that a trial court loses jurisdiction once an appeal is perfected.
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Nash v. Nash 388 N.W.2d 777 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 375 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow 375 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coady v. Jurek 366 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coady v. Jurek 366 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brzinski v. Frederickson 365 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Brzinski v. Frederickson 365 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Lundeen v. Lappi 361 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 1985