Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Love, 350 N.W.2d 359.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Love , (recognizing prosecutorial discretion in determining which offenses to charge, including an assessment of sentencing options).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
State v. Richmond
730 N.W.2d 62
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, (addressing charging under criminal-sexual-conduct versus intrafamilial-sexual-conduct statute); -23 (Minn.1982) (addressing charging under theft versus odometer-tampering statute); (addressing charging under theft ve
- State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Gebeck 635 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Donnay 600 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Donnay
600 N.W.2d 471
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
The court may make a disposi-tional departure, placing the defendant on probation if the defendant is “particularly *474 amenable to probation or if offense-related mitigating circumstances are present.”
- State v. Sejnoha 512 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Sejnoha
512 N.W.2d 597
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
ANALYSIS A sentencing court may disposition-ally depart and place a defendant on probation if the defendant is “particularly amenable to probation or if offense-related mitigating circumstances are present.”
- State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- State v. Dokken 487 N.W.2d 914 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Wedan v. State 409 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Wedan v. State 409 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Williams 396 N.W.2d 840 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Williams
396 N.W.2d 840
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
2198 , 60 L.Ed.2d 755 (1979)
- State v. Jones 381 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Jones 381 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Cermak
365 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 1985
where we held that the legislature’s passage of the intra-familial sexual abuse statute was not intended to limit the prosecutor’s discretion to prosecute under the criminal sexual conduct statute.
- State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
- State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
- State v. Case 350 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 1984