Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 389 N.W.2d 876.

226 citing documents.

Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Pillsbury Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh 425 N.W.2d 244 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court clarified its holding in Wild , stating: We did not hold that the harm resulting from a bad-faith termination of a contract could never give rise to a tort recovery.
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 426 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 1988
Because of the open-ended and volatile nature of punitive damages, this court exercises “close control over the imposition and assessment of punitive damages.” (quoting another source).
Alexandra House, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 419 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Alexandra House, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 419 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, (statement in a termination letter that an employee was terminated for failing to increase sales); (statement made during termination that employees’ conduct in refusing to obey an order to reduce the totals on their expense claims and so provide the employer with a tax benefit, amounted to “gross insubordination”).
Kletschka v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kletschka v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Goodkind v. University of Minnesota 417 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1988
Goodkind v. University of Minnesota 417 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 1988
See Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y, (discharge procedures); Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Fed.
Tsudek v. Target Stores, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tsudek v. Target Stores, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The truth or falsity of a statement is “inherently within the province of the jury.”
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bohdan v. Alltool Mfg., Co. 411 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
*907 Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 408 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1987
It bases this request on this court’s that punitive damages should not be available for a newly recognized cause of action.
Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co. 401 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1987
Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co. 401 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phipps v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. 396 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kulkay v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kulkay v. Allied Central Stores, Inc. 398 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Frankson v. Design Space International 394 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1986
Frankson v. Design Space International 394 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1986
in which this court concluded “that an employer’s communication to an employee of the reason for discharge may present a proper occasion upon which to recognize a qualified privilege.” Id.
Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co. 390 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co. 390 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1986